Artomo
Kontenajo efacita Kontenajo adjuntita
→Urgent need of help: Reply |
|||
Lineo 256:
:This means that we can create here in Wikivortaro such word forms, which are missing form "sources or references". Wikivortaro is your source in English Wiktionary! It is our task to have correct word forms here with correct translations into national languages, and offer in that manner correct materials for the other Wiktionaries. And because of the nature of artificial language, sometimes may happen that a natural language can not give a compact translation for Ido word. Is this one of the problems in English Wiktionary? <br>
:You may copy this message into the English Wiktionary if they doubt the correctness of some Ido word. Your expression "I could be blocked on the English Wiktionary" can't be true. Send your blockers to me. Best wishes - [[Uzanto:Artomo|Arto]] ([[Uzanto Debato:Artomo|talk]]) 07:20, 9 di agosto 2013 (UTC)
::Basically put, each Ido word has to have three durably archived sources in order for it to remain on the Wiktionary. I've only been able to find one or two sources for most of the words that I'm adding and it is making me a bit frustrated that I have to go on such a big source hunt for these terms. That is what is making me anxious. [[User:Razorflame|<b style="color:#00C">Raz</b><b style="color:#009">or</b>]][[User talk:Razorflame|<b style="color:#006">fl</b><b style="color:#003">am</b><b style="color:#000">e</b>]] 21:27, 9 di agosto 2013 (UTC)
== A suggestion for improving the English language ==
| |||